The request to continue debt collection is a fundamental step in the Swiss debt collection process. This mechanism allows the creditor to request the continuation of the recovery process after an objection by the debtor. Contrary to what one might think, the continuation of the debt collection process is not automatic; it requires active initiative from the creditor. This procedure highlights the delicate balance between the need to advance in the recovery process and the protection of the debtor’s rights. Without this request, the collection process would remain suspended, preventing the creditor from asserting their rights. Therefore, the request to continue debt collection plays a key role in ensuring that the recovery process can proceed in an orderly and predictable manner, while respecting the debtor’s right to contest the claim.
One of the distinctive features of the Swiss debt collection system is the absence of automatic continuation of the process. The request to continue debt collection is an indispensable tool that emphasizes the creditor’s responsibility to advance the process. This need for initiative by the creditor ensures that only active and diligently pursued claims progress within the judicial system. This prevents abandoned or inactive claims from overburdening the system, allowing for more efficient allocation of judicial resources. Additionally, this obligation for initiative reinforces the predictability of the process for the debtor, who can adequately prepare for each stage of the procedure. Thus, the request to continue debt collection is not merely a procedural formality but also a guarantee of the creditor’s seriousness and consistency.
The request to continue debt collection also plays a crucial role in protecting the debtor’s rights. By requiring the creditor to take active steps to continue the collection process, the Swiss legal system ensures that the debtor is informed at each stage and can fully exercise their rights of contestation and defense. This transparency and regularity in the process help prevent abuses and procedural surprises, offering the debtor a fair chance to respond to the creditor’s claims. Furthermore, the requirement for the request ensures that the debtor is not indefinitely under the threat of a suspended collection process, which could harm their financial and psychological stability. In sum, this procedure is essential for maintaining the balance between efficient recovery and the protection of individual rights.
The request to continue debt collection is an essential instrument in a legal system that values both efficiency and predictability. By obliging the creditor to express their intention to continue the process, the system ensures that each step is well-justified and that both parties are fully engaged in the process. This contributes to a smoother and more structured judicial procedure, minimizing delays and unjustified interruptions. Moreover, this requirement for a request offers a certain predictability for both the creditor and the debtor, by clarifying the intentions and actions of each party at every stage of the collection process. Thus, the request to continue debt collection is not just an administrative formality but a central pillar that supports the integrity and efficiency of the debt recovery system in Switzerland.
To submit a request to continue debt collection, the first essential condition is the existence of an established and due claim. This means that the creditor must have a claim that has been recognized as valid, either through a debt acknowledgment or a court decision. According to the Federal Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Act (LP), the claim must be certain, liquid, and due. A certain claim is one whose existence is uncontested; a liquid claim is one whose amount is determined or determinable; and a due claim is one whose payment term has arrived. These conditions ensure that only legitimate claims progress in the debt collection process, protecting the debtor from unfounded demands. The prior validation of the claim is therefore crucial to prevent procedural abuses and ensure fair treatment for both parties.
Before being able to submit a request to continue debt collection, the creditor must ensure that all preliminary steps of the recovery process have been correctly executed. This includes the issuance of a payment order, followed by any objection from the debtor, and the success of the lifting procedure. If the debtor objects, the creditor must obtain a provisional or definitive lifting decision before requesting the continuation of the collection process. A provisional lifting requires indisputable written creditor instruments, while a definitive lifting involves a full court hearing. Each step must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the LP for the request to continue debt collection to be valid. Strict adherence to these procedures is crucial to ensure that the creditor’s request is accepted by the debt collection office.
The request to continue debt collection must be formulated precisely and in compliance with legal requirements to be accepted. The creditor must submit the request to the competent debt collection office within the prescribed deadlines. According to the LP, the request must be made within three months following the lifting decision. The document must contain clear information about the claim, including the amount owed, the nature of the claim, and the date it became due. It must also mention the lifting decision obtained, whether provisional or definitive. A poorly formulated or incomplete request can result in its rejection, prolonging the procedure and delaying recovery. Therefore, it is essential that the creditor rigorously follows the steps for formulating the request to ensure its acceptance.
When a request to continue debt collection follows a provisional lifting, additional particularities must be considered. The provisional lifting allows the creditor to continue the recovery process quickly, but it remains contestable by the debtor. In this context, the debtor may file an action for debt release to contest the claim, thereby suspending forced execution. The request to continue debt collection after a provisional lifting must therefore be made with the awareness that the debtor still has the opportunity to substantially contest the claim. The creditor must be prepared to defend the validity of their claim more thoroughly if the debtor initiates such an action. This specificity underscores the importance of rigorous preparation and legal strategy when formulating the request.
The procedure for filing a request to continue debt collection in Switzerland is governed by precise rules. The first step is to choose the competent debt collection office, usually the one in the debtor’s place of residence or headquarters, as indicated in the Federal Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Act. The creditor must then prepare the request using the official forms available, ensuring that all required information is included: the amount of the claim, the nature of the claim, and the date it became due. The document must also mention the lifting decision obtained. Payment of administrative fees is mandatory for the request to be processed. Online links to the request forms are available on the official websites of the debt collection offices. Precision and completeness of these documents are essential to avoid delays or rejections of the request.
The content of the request to continue debt collection must be precise and complete to be accepted. In accordance with the applicable articles of the LP, the creditor must clearly indicate the exact amount of the claim, including interest and fees. It is also necessary to describe the nature of the claim, whether it is a contractual debt, a debt acknowledgment, or a court decision. The request must include the date on which the claim became due and provide detailed references to the lifting decision, whether provisional or definitive. An incomplete or poorly drafted request may be rejected by the debt collection office, forcing the creditor to restart the procedure and pay the fees again. Rigorous preparation of the document is therefore essential to avoid delays and ensure the acceptance of the request. Special attention to legal details is crucial to ensure the validity of the process.
The deadlines for filing a request to continue debt collection are strict and imperative. According to the LP, the creditor must file the request within three months of the notification of the lifting decision. This short deadline is designed to ensure rapid and efficient management of recovery procedures, minimizing uncertainty for the debtor. Failure to meet this deadline results in the loss of the right to continue, and the creditor will have to restart the process from the beginning, including the issuance of a new payment order. This penalty highlights the importance of vigilance and diligence on the part of the creditor in managing their claims. Respecting deadlines is crucial to maintaining the validity of the recovery process and avoiding additional legal complications. Proactive management of deadlines is therefore necessary to ensure the success of the request.
Failure to comply with deadlines and procedural requirements has significant consequences for the creditor’s rights. A request to continue debt collection filed outside the three-month deadline is automatically rejected, resulting in the termination of the ongoing collection process. The creditor will have to restart the procedure, incurring additional costs and losing time. Additionally, a poorly drafted or incomplete request may be refused by the debt collection office, prolonging the process and delaying the recovery of the claim. These errors can also affect the creditor’s credibility and complicate future relations with the debtor. Therefore, it is essential that the creditor rigorously follows the procedural steps and meets the deadlines to ensure the efficiency and legality of the collection process. Vigilance and rigor are key to avoiding procedural pitfalls and optimizing the recovery process.
The filing of the request to continue debt collection has immediate consequences for the progression of the process. Once the request is filed, the debt collection office resumes the handling of the case, allowing the continuation of the steps towards recovering the claim. This
step marks the end of the suspension of the process due to the objection and reactivates the enforcement process. Filing the request also signals that the creditor is determined to continue their efforts to recover the debt, demonstrating their resolve and commitment. This moment is crucial as it reactivates the legal and administrative mechanisms of the collection process, allowing the creditor to continue asserting their rights.
Once the request to continue debt collection is filed, the debt collection office determines the mode of collection based on the nature of the claim and the debtor’s situation. This choice is decisive for the subsequent steps of the procedure. The main modes of debt collection are seizure, bankruptcy, and realization of pledge. Seizure is generally used for unsecured claims, while bankruptcy applies to insolvent debtors, and realization of pledge concerns claims secured by a pledge. The determination of the mode of collection influences the specific actions that will be taken and the rights of the parties involved, particularly regarding the seizure of assets, the opening of bankruptcy, or the realization of pledges. This strategic choice directly impacts the speed and efficiency of recovery.
After determining the mode of collection, several important steps follow. For collection by seizure, the debt collection office conducts an inventory and seizes the debtor’s assets. These assets are then appraised and, if necessary, sold at auction to satisfy the claim. In the case of bankruptcy, a bankruptcy petition is filed, and if accepted, the court declares the debtor bankrupt, leading to the liquidation of their assets. For collection by realization of pledge, the debt collection office initiates the pledge realization process, which may include the sale of pledged assets to recover the debt. Each step is governed by specific procedures aimed at ensuring fair and orderly recovery of claims while respecting the debtor’s rights. It is also crucial to adhere to the deadlines imposed for each step to ensure the validity of the process.
The outcomes of the request to continue debt collection can vary depending on the debtor’s financial situation and the nature of the claim. If the process results in the seizure and sale of the debtor’s assets, the proceeds from the sale are used to repay the claim, taking into account collection fees and any other creditors. In the case of bankruptcy, the debtor’s assets are liquidated and distributed among the creditors according to established priority rules. If the collection involves a pledge, the realization of the pledge allows the repayment of the secured claim. Each outcome has specific implications for both the creditor and the debtor, influencing their financial situation and respective rights. The creditor may obtain full or partial repayment of their claim, while the debtor may face the liquidation of their assets and additional financial restrictions. In summary, the request to continue debt collection plays a central role in the progression and outcome of the recovery process, directly impacting the interests of the parties involved.
Initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take points of your situation with a specialized lawyer.
You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
Take an appointment now
by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
+41 21 566 77 47