The objection to the payment order is a crucial legal mechanism in Switzerland that allows debtors to contest a claim before it is enforced. When a debtor receives a payment order, they have the option to file an objection within 10 days from the date of notification. This objection immediately suspends the debt collection process, providing the debtor with temporary protection against enforcement measures. The ability to object without initially providing reasons or evidence ensures that this process is accessible to all, regardless of their legal knowledge. This approach guarantees that the debtor can quickly react to protect their rights without being burdened by complex formalities or initial proof requirements.
Filing an objection to a payment order is an essential step that allows the debtor to contest the claimed debt. The debtor must act within 10 days following the notification of the payment order. The objection can be made in writing by simply writing “objection” on the payment order and returning it to the Debt Collection Office, or verbally by going directly to the office. The process is designed to be accessible and does not require providing reasons or evidence at the time of objection. This simplicity ensures that all debtors, regardless of their legal knowledge, can exercise their right to contest a claim. Once the objection is filed, the debt collection process is suspended until the creditor takes steps to lift the objection. Additionally, the objection can be partial, allowing the debtor to contest only part of the claim.
The objection to the payment order has an immediate and significant impact on the debt collection process. By filing an objection, the debtor automatically suspends the progress of the collection. This means that the creditor cannot proceed with enforcement measures until the objection is lifted. To lift the objection, the creditor must initiate legal action, which involves proving the validity of the claim. This contentious phase offers the debtor an opportunity to defend their position and contest the creditor’s evidence. In practice, this can turn a quick administrative process into a longer and more complex legal battle. The objection thus plays a key role in ensuring that only justified claims are pursued, thereby reinforcing the fairness and transparency of the process. This legal mechanism helps prevent arbitrary or abusive collections.
The objection to the payment order has significant implications for both parties involved in the debt collection process. For the debtor, it provides immediate protection and the opportunity to prepare a solid defense. However, it also involves a legal confrontation with the creditor, which can be stressful and costly. For the creditor, the objection means a pause in the recovery process and the need to provide strong evidence of the claim. This can lead to additional delays and legal costs. Despite these challenges, the objection is a crucial tool to ensure that only legitimate claims are pursued. It promotes a balance between the creditors’ rights to recover their debts and the debtors’ rights to defend against potentially unjustified claims. Ultimately, this mechanism contributes to justice and fairness.
In Switzerland, when a debtor receives a payment order, they have 10 days to file an objection. This deadline, established by the Federal Act on Debt Collection and Bankruptcy (LP), begins as soon as the payment order is notified. It is crucial for the debtor to act quickly, as failure to file an objection within this timeframe means the collection process continues without the possibility of contesting the claim at this stage. This short deadline is intended to ensure the efficient and rapid management of claims while providing a first line of defense for the debtor. Swift action is essential for anyone wishing to contest a claim. It is important to note that this deadline is strict and virtually non-extendable, underscoring the urgency for the debtor to respond immediately upon receiving the payment order. In case of doubt, it is always preferable to file an objection as soon as the payment order is received.
The procedure for objecting to a payment order is designed to be simple and accessible. The debtor can file an objection in two main ways: verbally or in writing. For a verbal objection, the debtor must visit the Debt Collection Office and declare their objection. This declaration is then recorded in writing by an officer of the office. For a written objection, it is sufficient to write “objection” on the payment order or on a separate document and then send it or submit it in person to the Debt Collection Office. Sending the objection by registered mail is recommended to ensure it is properly received. This simplicity in the procedure allows all debtors, regardless of their means or level of legal knowledge, to effectively protect their rights.
One of the key aspects of the objection to the payment order is that it does not require any initial justification or evidence. The debtor does not need to provide reasons or documents to support their objection at the time of filing. This lack of formality makes the objection accessible and allows the debt collection process to be suspended immediately and automatically. This rule is designed to protect debtors against abusive or unjustified collections, giving them valuable time to prepare their defense. Without the need for justification, the objection process is significantly simplified, allowing anyone to exercise their right to contest without administrative hurdles. This measure is particularly beneficial for debtors who may find themselves in a stressful or rushed situation, allowing them to react quickly without having to provide detailed explanations.
Swiss law also allows for a partial objection, meaning the debtor can contest only part of the claimed debt. For example, a debtor may accept that they owe part of the amount but contest the total amount claimed by the creditor. To do this, they must clearly specify the portion of the claim they are contesting. The partial objection suspends the collection process only for the contested part of the claim, allowing the procedure to continue for the acknowledged part. This option offers additional flexibility and can be used strategically to manage claims more effectively. By settling undisputed amounts quickly while contesting disputed portions, the partial objection helps avoid prolonged conflicts and facilitates amicable settlements. This strategy also demonstrates the debtor’s good faith in acknowledging real debts while disputing the contested amounts.
The objection to the payment order automatically suspends enforcement measures under the Federal Act on Debt Collection and Bankruptcy (LP). As soon as the debtor files an objection, actions such as the seizure of assets, freezing of bank accounts, or auctioning of property are halted. This suspension provides immediate relief to the debtor, allowing them to breathe and organize their defense without the imminent pressure of enforcement measures. The purpose of this rule is to ensure that the debtor does not suffer irreparable harm before having the opportunity to contest the claim in court. The suspension remains in effect until the creditor takes steps to lift the objection, providing essential protection to the debtor against hasty actions. This gives the debtor a fair opportunity to prepare their response and defend themselves adequately.
When the debtor files an objection, the burden of proof shifts to the creditor, who must demonstrate the validity of their claim. To lift the objection, the creditor must initiate legal proceedings by requesting either provisional or definitive lifting of the objection. In this process, the creditor must present convincing evidence, such as signed contracts, invoices, or prior judgments. Provisional lifting may be granted based on clear debt instruments, but definitive lifting requires a court decision after thorough examination. These steps involve additional costs and a longer timeline for the creditor, who must not only prepare their case thoroughly but also comply with the strict procedural requirements of the legal system. The creditor must also anticipate the possibility that the debtor will present strong counter-evidence during the court hearing.
One of the main advantages of the objection for the debtor is gaining valuable time to prepare a defense. By suspending the debt collection process, the objection provides the debtor with the opportunity to consult legal advisors, gather evidence, and formulate arguments to contest the claim. This additional time is crucial for debtors who may be in a stressful or hurried situation. Moreover, this period can be used to attempt to negotiate an amicable settlement with the creditor, which could avoid a lengthy and costly court procedure. The time gained through the objection also allows the debtor to evaluate their options and plan an effective defense strategy, increasing their chances of success in court. In summary, this delay is a strategic opportunity for the debtor to build a strong and well-documented defense.
The objection triggers a detailed judicial review of the claim, ensuring a fair process for the debtor. The court examines the evidence presented by the creditor and assesses the legitimacy of the claim. This process includes the analysis of documents, hearing of witnesses, and consideration of the legal arguments from both parties. The judicial review allows for the detection of errors, fraud, or abusive practices, providing additional protection to the debtor. Moreover, this judicial oversight reinforces the transparency and fairness of the debt recovery system by ensuring that only justified claims are pursued. This rigorous judicial procedure ensures that the debtor is not compelled to pay an unfounded claim, thereby protecting their rights and ensuring impartial justice. It also helps maintain trust in the legal system by demonstrating its commitment to a fair and thorough evaluation of contested claims.
Once the debtor has filed an objection, the creditor must initiate a request for lifting the objection to continue the debt collection process. This request is essential to unblock the procedure and requires the creditor to prove the validity of their claim. The request for lifting the objection can be provisional or definitive, depending on the available evidence. For provisional lifting, documents such as an acknowledgment of debt or an enforceable judgment are required. This quick process allows the collection to resume, but the debtor can contest this decision. The lifting procedure marks the beginning of a judicial phase where the rights of each party are rigorously examined. In case of contestation by the debtor, a hearing may be necessary to further examine the evidence presented. This phase is crucial as it determines the continuation of the debt recovery process.
The judicial process for lifting the objection involves several crucial steps. The creditor must file a petition with the competent court, accompanied by evidence of the claim. A hearing is usually held where both parties can present their arguments and evidence. The court evaluates the documents, hears witnesses if necessary, and analyzes the facts before rendering a decision. Provisional lifting can be obtained quickly, but it remains contestable by the debtor. Definitive lifting, however, requires a final judicial decision after thorough examination. This process ensures that all claims are verified fairly and equitably, protecting debtors’ rights against unfounded claims. This judicial step is essential to guarantee transparency and fairness in handling contested claims. It also helps establish clear jurisprudence on issues of claim validity.
Swiss law imposes strict deadlines that the creditor must respect to obtain the lifting of the objection. The creditor has 20 days to request provisional lifting after receiving the objection. For definitive lifting, a debt recognition action must be initiated within two months. These deadlines are designed to prevent the debtor from remaining in uncertainty for an extended period and to encourage the creditor to act quickly. Failure to meet these deadlines results in the expiration of the collection process, forcing the creditor to start over. Respecting these timelines is crucial for the creditor to maintain the validity of their claim and continue the recovery process. By adhering to the deadlines, the creditor also demonstrates their seriousness and commitment to recovering the claim legally.
The lifting of the objection has significant repercussions for both the debtor and the creditor. For the debtor, it means the resumption of the debt collection measures, including asset seizure and bank account freezing, leading to severe financial consequences. The debtor also must bear the legal costs and attorney fees. For the creditor, obtaining the lifting of the objection allows the recovery process to continue but involves additional costs related to the judicial procedure. However, if the lifting is contested by the debtor, the process can be prolonged, further increasing costs and delays. The final court decision is crucial and can still be subject to appeal, offering the debtor a final opportunity to present new arguments or evidence. These consequences highlight the importance for each party to carefully prepare their case before engaging in or contesting a lifting procedure.
Initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take points of your situation with a specialized lawyer.
You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
Take an appointment now
by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
+41 21 566 77 47